jdeere5220 wrote:
I think this makes a very good case that we DO NOT need new taxes to push our economy away from oil dependency. The free market will do this just fine. As oil supplies get tighter (or, more accurately, as demand continues to rise), prices will go up. Other energy sources will become more competitive, and private enterprise will see a potential for profit in alternative sources.
No need for congressional mandates to burn corn.
No need for Federal CAFE standards.
I think we are too busy getting ourselves involved in another civil war to worry much about new taxes right now anyway. Hooray

That model doesn't work here for two reasons.
1 Peak oil does not produce a gradual increase in prices, slowly making oil less competitive; prices will rise quickly way beyond what is economical. The rise will be preceded by highly volatile prices creating uncertainty and frantic speculation about energy futures, but will ultimately settle at prices which are multiples of todays prices. Whenever it starts it will all happen within a few years, not decades.
2. Energy infrastructure: power plants, transportation vehicles, homes, appliances and equipment, have an economic life of 10-40 years and in the case of power plants, homes and automobiles are very expensive to replace. That means in the meantime we are stuck consuming oil at market prices that will throw us into a recession and more or less stop economic growth for decades.
If we wait for peak oil, facts one and two mean that even if we pulled out all the stops to replace the current vehicles and build power plants or whatever infrastructure we need to support the new transportation regime we would be competing with the whole world trying to do the same thing at the same time which would drive up demand way beyond supply capacity so the prices of technologies and materials needed to replace the current infrastructure would skyrocket. And we would be buying most of them from whatever countries are ahead of the curve on alternative fuel technologies, i.e where governments have made regulations that created a market for alternatives. The conversion process would take a few decades and the economy would suffer all the while.
It makes more sense to gradually build a diverse energy portfolio to decrease the risks associated with any one source- especially a source that we know ends badly. That won't happen without government intervention. This has the added benefit of consuming oil more slowly thus delaying the inevitable onset of peak oil and ultimately lessening the impact when it happens - whenever that might be. Plus it will decrease our trade deficit.
Of course if we have already arrived at peak oil we are f...ed. But at least you can be happy that our government did nothing to prepare for it.