Cooling the Warming Debate: Major New Analysis Confirms That Global Warming Is Real


ScienceDaily (Oct. 21, 2011) — Global warming is real, according to a major study released Oct. 20. Despite issues raised by climate change skeptics, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study finds reliable evidence of a rise in the average world land temperature of approximately 1°C since the mid-1950s.



www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111021144716.htm

Occam wrote:

You are so gullible. Muller is an unscrupulous conman. This is worse than Michael Mann's hockey stick fraud. If you were really interested in the truth, you wouldn't post such crap. Any credibility Muller may have had at one time is gone, and I'll bet you've read some of the facts but will never acknowledge them. Further, BEST is only using land data which says nothing about "global" warming, but does highlight UHI effects and microsite issues because the surface should not be warming faster than the troposphere. How can it?

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague



There are so many scathing critiques of this junk science it is too much to post, so for those interested in Muller's shenanigans, it is very easy to search.

Please explain how the surface can warm faster than the lower troposphere when that shouldn't be the case according to the very basics of atmospheric physics, and the missing hot spot in the tropical troposphere. It has surpassed the point of absurdity how you people obfuscate and make it up as you go along.


In the meantime Occam, AGW "scientists" predicted the U.S. would experience warmer winters and declining snow, when exactly the opposite has occurred. The same for Europe. AGW is a load of crap and I think you know it.

....

Global Emissions Set to Surge 50 Percent by 2050: OECD

Global greenhouse gas emissions could rise 50 percent by 2050 without more ambitious climate policies, as fossil fuels continue to dominate the energy mix, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said on Thursday

www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?i...surge-50-pct-by-2050

www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/

Occam wrote:


news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/04/s...n-worlds.html?ref=hp

Occam wrote:


Duh.... Billions of Chinese and Indians can now afford to drive and stay warm. Instead inventing new ways to raise taxes, we should be preparing for a warmer world. So far, it's quite tasty here in Michigan.

Once again UAH gets it wrong. I never did trust Spencer and his satellite data. He needs to spend more time doing his job and getting his data right and less time advocating his homespun climate theories for the denialist groupies that read his blogsite.


New Research Brings Satellite Measurements and Global Climate Models Closer


ScienceDaily (May 7, 2012) — One popular climate record that shows a slower atmospheric warming trend than other studies contains a data calibration problem, and when the problem is corrected the results fall in line with other records and climate models, according to a new University of Washington study.

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120507151209.htm
1.Stephen Po-Chedley, Qiang Fu. A bias in the mid-tropospheric channel warm target factor on the NOAA-9 microwave sounding unit. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2012; : 120123121514002 DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00147.1

Occam wrote:


I'm sure you understand it completely Occam.

www.drroyspencer.com/2012/05/our-respons...tures/#comment-45161

Mark Serreze "expert" at NSIDC warned of it being ice free this year. How's that going ROFL. Back in 2007/2008 on the old forum you were posting links to "scientists say" Arctic doom.

Antarctic?

The fraudsters at NOAA (Tom Karl) and NASA (James Hansen and Tom Karl) have been busy at work for many years now.
stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/n...840-months-in-a-row/




Hansen said in 1986 the U.S. would warm 2 degrees by 2006. How's that going?

How's the permanent drought going in Texas? The Southwest U.S.? Australia? Anywhere else you guys are making it up as you go along?


Occam, did history begin in 1979? 1950? Have you ever bothered to look at historical records of weather events? Things were MUCH worse 60+ years ago in the U.S. than the last 20 years.

"Expert" predictions for permanent drought in Australia. I have little doubt Occam posted this or similar:
www.smh.com.au/news/environment/this-dro...3/1198949986473.html



Reality:

"Permanent drought" in Southwest U.S.

is.gd/UdFi1q