Welcome, Guest

Profile for DG (xracer)

  • OFFLINE
  • Rank: Firestarter
  • Register Date: 10 Dec 2010
  • Last Visit Date: 21 Mar 2013
  • Time Zone: GMT +0:00
  • Local Time: 20:23
  • Posts: 129
  • Profile Views: 270
  • Karma: -18
  • Location: Unknown
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown

Signature

Posts

Posts

emo
BTW Occam, OHC in the North Pacific and North Atlantic north of the tropics is falling since ARGO was officially launched in 2003. Look at it for yourself:
Data here: climexp.knmi.nl/start.cgi?id=someone@somewhere




And the further north, the faster it drops.
Oops, you didn't check?
Tracking the Heat
emo
Occam wrote:
Illegal for Sea Level to Rise in North Carolina.

In one US state, it is now illegal for sea level rise to speed up. Although climate models predict that sea level rise will accelerate over the coming decades, North Carolina's state senate has passed a bill saying that its Division of Coastal Management cannot "include scenarios of accelerated rates of sea level rise".


www.newscientist.com/article/dn21951-the...olina.html?full=true

It would be funny if dults like these didn't dominate the legislative branch in this country. But at least they didn't legislate that sea level isn't rising - so I guess that passes for progress these days.

a lighter take on the issue...
www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report...-word---sink-or-swim
It would be sobering if dults didn't believe everything they read.

Cherry picking start dates is fun isn't it? Sea level rise is decelerating.
wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/01/part-2-of...st-of-north-america/
The Big Melt
emo
www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montan...a9-001cc4c03286.html

The recent news release concerning the melting glaciers in Glacier National Park seems somewhat deceptive. I am a National Park Service retiree. I started my career in Glacier National Park in 1963 and attended my first park staff meeting in September of 1963.

At that meeting the United States Geological Survey staff presented the results of their annual glacier monitoring program and reported that the park glaciers were continuing to shrink. They assured the park staff that the glaciers would eventually disappear, but would not make any time predictions.

The park superintendent thanked the USGS for their effort and took the opportunity to remind the staff that the park was named Glacier because of the park topography that was formed by the action of continental glaciers thousands of years ago, not because glaciers existed in the park. It was understood and accepted by the National Park Service and the United States Geological Survey that the park glaciers were a remnant of the last ice age and would eventually melt.

It is disconcerting to hear government professionals now blame the ice melting on anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming.

The USGS wondered 50 years ago why glaciers remained in the park when the mountains north and south of the park at the same elevations did not have glaciers. The USGS of 50 years ago also would not have claimed that the disappearance of glaciers would result in uncontrolled wildfire threats. A review of the hydrology involved is needed.

The park master plan that was in place at the time specified a visitor center at the foot of Lake McDonald and the park staff was recommending an audio-visual presentation in a theater facing the head of the lake. The presentation would illustrate on screen a glacial landscape followed by movement and melting of the ice and finally curtains would open to show the existing landscape.

One of the objectives was to show the park visitor what a glacier was and could do, because it was understood that they would soon be gone.
The Big Melt
emo
Occam wrote:
Why Seas Are Rising Ahead of Predictions: Estimates of Rate of Future Sea-Level Rise May Be Too Low


ScienceDaily (Nov. 1, 2012) — Sea levels are rising faster than expected from global warming, and University of Colorado geologist Bill Hay has a good idea why. The last official IPCC report in 2007 projected a global sea level rise between 0.2 and 0.5 meters by the year 2100. But current sea-level rise measurements meet or exceed the high end of that range and suggest a rise of one meter or more by the end of the century.




www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121101153549.htm
That's odd. NASA JPL just acknowledged recently that sea level rise has been erroneous; there is no accelerating rise and even using the inflated data clearly shows it is decelerating. Honest people can read about it here:
wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012...9-bar-sever-pr51.pdf


Note that GRACE has been determined (known for years) to be contributing spurious sea level rise. GRACE has also been used to justify OHC increases since 2006. In the coming year the entire sea level budget will need to be reanalyzed. Watch in the coming months. Your source is full of crap.


How fraudsters play the game and brainwash kids (and useful idiot adults):
epa.gov/climatechange/kids/impacts/signs/glaciers.html
Glaciers all over the world have been melting for at least the last 50 years, and the rate of melting is speeding up. Many glaciers in Alaska and other parts of the United States have shrunk dramatically.

Start with a 1940 photo


Jump to a 2004 photo


Don’t show the 1950 photo, which shows that most of the melt occurred during the 1940s
gallery.usgs.gov/images/climate_change/2...Field%20-%201950.jpg



Don’t show the map which tells us that two thirds of the glacier’s retreat occurred before 1880



Gee Occam, did history begin in 1979? 80% of glacier melt occurred well before 1960, probably before 1950.
The Big Melt
emo
www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/pu...07-xk2Sdg/881407.pdf
Maximum warming is predicted to occur in the middle and upper tropical troposphere.


Got it? The "hot spot" that doesn't exist via data from 2 different satellites show 200-400% error in models through 2009, and most likely through the end of 2012. Please don't bother with posting model validation via obscure "methods" such as winds etc.; that only highlights your lack of integrity.
Tracking the Heat
emo
Every once in while I come back to see what new BS Occam is posting on his private blog here. Yep, same old nonsense. It isn't worth the time anymore to counter his lies and deception, but he can always dream of having his own flock of lemmings.

Get over it Occam. Global warming has stopped and people are sick of hearing about it. Over 5 years ago I said this was all a bunch of hooey remember? Take some reality pills and live life.


Honest people can read about the latest Met O scam here: bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/ukmo...he-decadal-forecast/
Hey Occam, what's your spin on this? It's been reported at several media outlets surprisingly, did you miss it? Note how Met O makes it look like their past failed predictions including the last 5 years were correct (the thin white line) using their "new and improvedR" climate model; what's this, their 5th revision since 2006?
ROFL and Happy New Year.
Tracking the Heat
emo
Occam wrote:
Fresh hockey sticks from the Southern Hemisphere

www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2...southern-hemisphere/



You probably think the old hockey sticks are still valid The rest of your posts are the same old alarmist crap that gets recycled every generation.

300,000 dollars and three years to produce a paper that lasted three weeks: Gergis

When Steve McIntyre asked for the full data, she refused. Gergis has an activist past which she has recently tried to hide. She was proud to mention in her biography that her data has been requested from 16 nations: So requests from Tunisia, Cuba, and Brazil are OK; but Canada — not so much. Apparently she didn’t appreciate his expertise with statistics and told him to get the data himself from the original authors, and added ” This is commonly referred to as ‘research’. We will not be entertaining any further correspondence on the matter. “


That's the same response Mann, Steig, Jones and Santer gave.

“Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”
Paleoclimate
emo
We have an oil glut too, and when Obama and his Comrades are booted out, the EPA is reigned in, we will get it.

The 'Green Economy' boon Obama promised worked out just great didn't it?

Anyone check their electric rates lately? Obama is living up to his promises.


Some (you know who you are) think .5-1% emitting of the world's mercury into the atmosphere by U.S. power companies justifies Obama and his minions plan to shut down our economy. Yes, nature by far is the worst climate criminal for mercury emissions, but no word on Obama's plan for stopping it.
Natural Gas Shortage ...
emo Tracking the Heat
emo
"Permanent drought" in Southwest U.S.

is.gd/UdFi1q



Tracking the Heat
emo
"Expert" predictions for permanent drought in Australia. I have little doubt Occam posted this or similar:
www.smh.com.au/news/environment/this-dro...3/1198949986473.html

IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation's most senior weather experts warned yesterday.


Reality:
Tracking the Heat
emo
Occam wrote:
Once again UAH gets it wrong. I never did trust Spencer and his satellite data. He needs to spend more time doing his job and getting his data right and less time advocating his homespun climate theories for the denialist groupies that read his blogsite.


New Research Brings Satellite Measurements and Global Climate Models Closer


ScienceDaily (May 7, 2012) — One popular climate record that shows a slower atmospheric warming trend than other studies contains a data calibration problem, and when the problem is corrected the results fall in line with other records and climate models, according to a new University of Washington study.

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120507151209.htm
1.Stephen Po-Chedley, Qiang Fu. A bias in the mid-tropospheric channel warm target factor on the NOAA-9 microwave sounding unit. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2012; : 120123121514002 DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00147.1


I'm sure you understand it completely Occam.

www.drroyspencer.com/2012/05/our-respons...tures/#comment-45161

Mark Serreze "expert" at NSIDC warned of it being ice free this year. How's that going ROFL. Back in 2007/2008 on the old forum you were posting links to "scientists say" Arctic doom.

Antarctic?

The fraudsters at NOAA (Tom Karl) and NASA (James Hansen and Tom Karl) have been busy at work for many years now.
stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/n...840-months-in-a-row/




Hansen said in 1986 the U.S. would warm 2 degrees by 2006. How's that going?

How's the permanent drought going in Texas? The Southwest U.S.? Australia? Anywhere else you guys are making it up as you go along?


Occam, did history begin in 1979? 1950? Have you ever bothered to look at historical records of weather events? Things were MUCH worse 60+ years ago in the U.S. than the last 20 years.
Tracking the Heat
emo
Last year it was permanent drought in Texas.

More food for useful idiots.
Effects of warm and ...
emo
Occam wrote:
BS Detector Coming


www.niemanlab.org/2011/11/bull-beware-tr...s-sentences-in-news/

The contributions to this forum from several notable individuals ought to light up like a christmas tree.



Obama's Job Approval Drops Below Carter's
Federal Debt
emo
Occam wrote:
Federal Agency Encourages Its Scientists to Speak Out

blogs.scientificamerican.com/observation...ntists-to-speak-out/


They did, but not what they wanted to public to here

climategate; the gift that keeps on giving.

wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/30/climategate-2-0-emails-thread-2/
OBAMA
emo
Occam wrote:
www.cnn.com/2011/12/07/world/europe/floo...ther-2011/index.html
Floods, landslides, fire and drought: Extreme weather the norm in 2011


Never happened before, right Occam?
Effects of warm and ...
emo
Occam wrote:
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111208173647.htm

Paleoclimate Record Points Toward Potential Rapid Climate Changes


ScienceDaily (Dec. 8, 2011) — New research into Earth's paleoclimate history by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies director James E. Hansen suggests the potential for rapid climate changes this century, including multiple meters of sea level rise, if global warming is not abated


Hansen, the Lysenko of our time.
Rapid Climate Change
emo
Here's what I did
www.butkus.org/ups/ups.htm
Anyone use UPS/batte ...
emo
Occam wrote:
Revealed – the capitalist network that runs the world

AS PROTESTS against financial power sweep the world this week, science may have confirmed the protesters' worst fears. An analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy.


....."In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network," says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.

www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354....-runs-the-world.html


It is notable you NEVER lay blame on Big Government or Socialist programs that have brought the world to the brink of economic collapose. No it is always evil capitalist banks. Who the hell bailed them out? AIG is asking for still more. Oh it's perfectly ok for Obama to flush billions down the toilet on worthless "green" energy scams, and dole out hundreds of billions to unions right? No peep from you when Obama wiped out 300 years of contractual law and threw the lawful investors under the bus when GM was bailed out and gave it to the UAW. Where did all that "stimulus" money go? Where did it come from?


Maybe you should learn what capitalism is first. Either that or stop lying when you have claimed in the past you are a capitalist.

"Warren Buffet is full of it"


Federal Debt
emo
Occam wrote:
Cooling the Warming Debate: Major New Analysis Confirms That Global Warming Is Real


ScienceDaily (Oct. 21, 2011) — Global warming is real, according to a major study released Oct. 20. Despite issues raised by climate change skeptics, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study finds reliable evidence of a rise in the average world land temperature of approximately 1°C since the mid-1950s.



www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111021144716.htm

You are so gullible. Muller is an unscrupulous conman. This is worse than Michael Mann's hockey stick fraud. If you were really interested in the truth, you wouldn't post such crap. Any credibility Muller may have had at one time is gone, and I'll bet you've read some of the facts but will never acknowledge them. Further, BEST is only using land data which says nothing about "global" warming, but does highlight UHI effects and microsite issues because the surface should not be warming faster than the troposphere. How can it?

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague



There are so many scathing critiques of this junk science it is too much to post, so for those interested in Muller's shenanigans, it is very easy to search.

Please explain how the surface can warm faster than the lower troposphere when that shouldn't be the case according to the very basics of atmospheric physics, and the missing hot spot in the tropical troposphere. It has surpassed the point of absurdity how you people obfuscate and make it up as you go along.


In the meantime Occam, AGW "scientists" predicted the U.S. would experience warmer winters and declining snow, when exactly the opposite has occurred. The same for Europe. AGW is a load of crap and I think you know it.
Tracking the Heat
More
Time to create page: 1.10 seconds
Best free joomla themes